Post Earthday Post.
I am not an environmentalist, I never have been. I've never contributed to Greenpeace, attended a rally, or saved any whales or wetlands. In fact the entire mainstream environmentalist movement has been an anathema to me. I could never buy into the curbside recycle bins, earth day celebrations, or sad video montages of deforested countryside, complete with teary eyed "Indian". But there was always one environmental movement that I was on board for, Bruce Sterling's Viridian movement. Since before Y2K, the Viridians have focused on the minimization of CO2 gas emissions. Not in a way that tugs your heart strings or lays on a guilt trip. They've done it smartly. Encouraging an eco-friendly culture through innovation and improved designs. And now that glaciers are melting and New Orleans is under water, the rest of the greens are starting to follow Sterling's example. It's the best possible thing to happen to environmentalism, and probably the best thing that could happen to the environment.
My favorite globe focused website is WorldChanging. They excel at looking at new unique solutions to very large complex problems. New approaches to food, housing, energy, resources, manufacturing, recycling, and somethings you haven't even heard of yet. And then there is Greapeace founder Patrick Moore, who has long since broken off from the fear mongering anti-everything extremist politicos that have dominated the Greenpeace movement. He has come out in favor of both nuclear energy, and genetically modified crops and livestock. These are the sorts of people that are needed now more than ever. Dont tell me that I need to tighten my belt and reduce my "footprint". Yes I use up ten times as many resources as the average global citizen. But rather than asking me to make do with 3 hectares of planetary resources as opposed to 20, why not up the production of those hectares I use, making 3 do the work of 20. Don't take away my inefficient electronics, and smog belching automobile. Give me the option of of better, cleaner, more efficient ones. Not only will I be on board for that, I'll probably pay you through the teeth for it.
Next year's Toyota Prius is going to get 93 miles to the gallon, Ninety Three. That means I could get from Detroit to Chicago on three gallons of gas. And it's not some smaller slower golf cart. It will be faster, and have better acceleration than the Prius on the road right now. Germany plans to market the Loremo in 2009, that will get 150mpg, and cost all of $13,000 American. For the DIY crowd, companies are selling aftermarket add-ons for hybrid cars, that will let you run completely off of electrical power for short commutes, or turn your car into an emergency gas powered generator for your home.
The average laptop computer uses an order of magnitude less electricity than the average desktop. A sleek new ultra portable uses even less. Try running your humming computer tower and wide screen monitor off of a palm sized battery for 3 hours. You wont get very far. I like these things, I want them. I'll pay for them. Not because of their environmental impact. (Which would be substantial if everyone switched over from gas to hybrids, and from towers to laptops.) Nor is it because of the rewarding feeling I get by making the morally right choices. I really don't care about any of that. I like them because they are new. They are smaller, cooler, smarter, and cheaper than their less eco-friendly alternatives of years ago. Owning something that neat doesn't require any heart strings to be tugged, just leak a picture of it on Engadget.
My Apartment is lit entirely by low wattage hyper efficient long lasting light bulbs. I didn't make that decision based on the amount of coal that is required to provide electricity to power normal Edison age lights. I bought them because now I'll never have to change a light bulb again for as long as I live here. As an added bonus, they just happen to get by on 23 watts instead of 100. Don't ration how often and at what time we are allowed to water our lawns. Instead let us have lawns that require less watering. If they are greener and hardier and easier to maintain, we will buy them. Let the farmers of the world grow GM crops. Sure we don't know their long term impacts. However we do know the long term impacts of famine.
"Saving" the earth isn't a question of reducing and reusing and recycling "before it's too late". It's a matter of changing the rules of the game; Cradle to Cradle design, urban farms, intelligently designed population centers, arcologies, krill, fuel producing algae. Make it smarter, make it better, make it cheaper, and make it cooler. I am not resistant to any of that. And if the environmental movement can get behind realistic complex reasonable solutions to these big global problems, maybe just maybe the rest of the world will come alongfor the ride. I'll tell you one thing for sure. If you can sell it to me, you can sell it to anyone. And that just might save the world. [inspired by Wired]
“Innovation is the ability to see change as an opportunity - not a threat” - Anon
My favorite globe focused website is WorldChanging. They excel at looking at new unique solutions to very large complex problems. New approaches to food, housing, energy, resources, manufacturing, recycling, and somethings you haven't even heard of yet. And then there is Greapeace founder Patrick Moore, who has long since broken off from the fear mongering anti-everything extremist politicos that have dominated the Greenpeace movement. He has come out in favor of both nuclear energy, and genetically modified crops and livestock. These are the sorts of people that are needed now more than ever. Dont tell me that I need to tighten my belt and reduce my "footprint". Yes I use up ten times as many resources as the average global citizen. But rather than asking me to make do with 3 hectares of planetary resources as opposed to 20, why not up the production of those hectares I use, making 3 do the work of 20. Don't take away my inefficient electronics, and smog belching automobile. Give me the option of of better, cleaner, more efficient ones. Not only will I be on board for that, I'll probably pay you through the teeth for it.
Next year's Toyota Prius is going to get 93 miles to the gallon, Ninety Three. That means I could get from Detroit to Chicago on three gallons of gas. And it's not some smaller slower golf cart. It will be faster, and have better acceleration than the Prius on the road right now. Germany plans to market the Loremo in 2009, that will get 150mpg, and cost all of $13,000 American. For the DIY crowd, companies are selling aftermarket add-ons for hybrid cars, that will let you run completely off of electrical power for short commutes, or turn your car into an emergency gas powered generator for your home.
The average laptop computer uses an order of magnitude less electricity than the average desktop. A sleek new ultra portable uses even less. Try running your humming computer tower and wide screen monitor off of a palm sized battery for 3 hours. You wont get very far. I like these things, I want them. I'll pay for them. Not because of their environmental impact. (Which would be substantial if everyone switched over from gas to hybrids, and from towers to laptops.) Nor is it because of the rewarding feeling I get by making the morally right choices. I really don't care about any of that. I like them because they are new. They are smaller, cooler, smarter, and cheaper than their less eco-friendly alternatives of years ago. Owning something that neat doesn't require any heart strings to be tugged, just leak a picture of it on Engadget.
My Apartment is lit entirely by low wattage hyper efficient long lasting light bulbs. I didn't make that decision based on the amount of coal that is required to provide electricity to power normal Edison age lights. I bought them because now I'll never have to change a light bulb again for as long as I live here. As an added bonus, they just happen to get by on 23 watts instead of 100. Don't ration how often and at what time we are allowed to water our lawns. Instead let us have lawns that require less watering. If they are greener and hardier and easier to maintain, we will buy them. Let the farmers of the world grow GM crops. Sure we don't know their long term impacts. However we do know the long term impacts of famine.
"Saving" the earth isn't a question of reducing and reusing and recycling "before it's too late". It's a matter of changing the rules of the game; Cradle to Cradle design, urban farms, intelligently designed population centers, arcologies, krill, fuel producing algae. Make it smarter, make it better, make it cheaper, and make it cooler. I am not resistant to any of that. And if the environmental movement can get behind realistic complex reasonable solutions to these big global problems, maybe just maybe the rest of the world will come alongfor the ride. I'll tell you one thing for sure. If you can sell it to me, you can sell it to anyone. And that just might save the world. [inspired by Wired]
2 Comments:
I think it would do everyone good to focus on energy conservation - not using it in the first place when possible.
FYI: You might be interested to know that Stewart Brand, the founder of The Whole Earth Catalog mentioned in Dr. Moore's linked article above as another environmentalist calling for a second look at nuclear power, has also endorsed a techno-thriller novel of nuclear power by a longtime industry insider (me). This story serves as a lay person's guide to the good and the bad of this power source. (There's plenty of both.) The book is available at no cost to readers at http://RadDecision.blogspot.com - and they seem to like it, judging from their comments on the homepage.
I agree, but I thik that conservation through efficient mediums, as opposed to conservatoin for it's own sake, is the only way you will ever get wide spread adoption. I'm certainly not going to use less heat in the winter becuase of some isoteric principle. Now give me a more efficient heater, and I'm sold.
Thanks for the heads up. I'll check out your boook, it sounds very interesting.
And thanks for reading Memepunks!
Post a Comment
<< Home